Legal Opinion
Joslin v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 23, 1961No. Civ. 19303PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, J. pro tem. *
This appeal is from a judgment which followed an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer without leave to amend. Since the judgment is based on the pleadings alone, the allegations of the complaint must be viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. We assume that plaintiff has epitomized the allegations of the complaint as advantageously as possible, so we accept his summary which is:
“The complaint alleges in substance as follows:
“1. The defendant operated the train in question on a public city street in Redwood City, California.
“2. That the train was a freight…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Courtell v. McEachenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Reynolds v. WillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- King v. LennenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Garcia v. SoogianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Gutirrez v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- O'Keefe v. South End Rowing ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Holland v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Alston v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- Beard v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Durham v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.