Parrott v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
TOLIN, District Judge.
This action to recover damages under the Tort Claims Act 1 produced evidence of near-gross negligence on the part of Government personnel. Unless the application of some special defensive rule arises to defeat recovery, the plaintiffs should prevail. It is urged by the Government that two such rules completely negative the plaintiffs’ case. The first of these is that “ * * * [A] vendor of land is not subject to liability for bodily harm caused to his vendee or others while upon the land after the vendee has taken possession by any dangerous condition, whether natural or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Warner v. Santa Catalina Island Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Smith v. TuckerTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Giannini v. CampodonicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Copfer v. GoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brock Ex Rel. Baer v. Rogers & Babler, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Beard v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Medlin v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1965
- Aretz v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1977
- Duvall v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.