Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Lagosz

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 26, 2010No. AC 30545PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

In this easement dispute between neighbors, the defendant Teresa B. Lagosz appeals from the judgment of the trial court 1 granting the motion to enforce a settlement agreement filed by the plaintiffs, Dale J. Hogan and Maria J. Hogan. 2 The defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that (1) her attorney possessed apparent authority to act on her behalf and (2) the parties entered into a binding settlement agreement. In support of the latter contention, the defendant further asserts that the court improperly found the settlement agreement enforceable in the face…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Audubon Parking Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Grovenburg v. Rustle Meadow Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. Matos v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. Vance v. TassmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Acadia Insurance v. O'ReillyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Hogan v. LagoszConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API