Legal Opinion
Vance v. Tassmer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 19, 2011No. AC 31754PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALVORD, J.
The defendants, Kenneth P. Tassmer and Richard W. Perillo, appeal from the judgment of the trial court transferring to the plaintiffs, Ronald J. Vance and Carol P. Vance, title to real property claimed to be owned by the defendants. The defendants claim that the court’s enforcement of the parties’ settlement agreement, after a hearing held pursuant to Audubon Parking Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc., 225 Conn. 804, 626 A.2d 729 (1993), was improper because the court (1) held that the agreement was clear and unambiguous, (2) decided issues of fact in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Audubon Parking Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Ackerman v. Sobol Family Partnership, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Harley v. Indian Spring Land Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Keller v. BeckensteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matos v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Krasko v. KonkosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- Blaine v. BurnesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Burns v. AdlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Santos v. Massad-Zion Motor Sales Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.