Legal Opinion

Acadia Insurance v. O'Reilly

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 2, 2012No. AC 33950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The self-represented defendants, John T. O’Reilly and Erin O’Reilly, appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their motion to open the default judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, Acadia Insurance Company and 139 Washington Avenue, LLC. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly denied that motion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

In early November, 2010, the plaintiffs commenced a negligence action against the defendants stemming from an incident that occurred on March 14,2010. Their complaint alleged that, at all relevant times, Acadia…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. State v. ToccoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. Priest v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shamitz v. TafflerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. D2E Holdings, LLC v. Corp. for Urban Home Ownership of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  3. Marulli v. Wood Frame Construction Co., LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  4. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Widow(er), Heir(s) and/or Creditors of the Estate of Beryl E. RowlandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  5. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Widow(er), Heir(s) and/or Creditors of the Estate of Beryl E. RowlandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API