Legal Opinion
Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 10, 2003No. A9210-07050; A86556PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
This case is before us for a third time. Defendants Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Schering-Plough Corporation, and Schering Corporation (collectively Key), seek a reversal of a punitive damage award entered in 1994 in favor of cross-claim plaintiff Frederick D. Edwards, M.D. (Edwards). For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that Key is entitled to a remittitur of part of the punitive damage award or to a new trial.
The pertinent facts were set forth in this court’s original opinions, Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 158 Or App 521, 974 P2d 758 (1999) (Bocci I), vac’d and rem’d, 332 Or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Simon v. San Paolo US Holding Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Hamlin v. Hampton Lumber Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Strawn v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.