Legal Opinion

Simon v. San Paolo US Holding Co., Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2005No. S121933PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

In an action arising from plaintiff’s failed attempt to purchase an office building from defendant, the jury found that the parties had no binding and enforceable agreement but that defendant had committed promissory fraud. On his fraud cause of action, plaintiff was awarded $5,000 in economic compensatory damages and $1.7 million in punitive damages. Considering all the relevant circumstances, we conclude this award of punitive damages exceeds the federal due process limitations outlined in recent United States Supreme Court decisions. We further conclude the maximum award…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Roby v. McKesson Corp.California Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Seltzer v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Major v. Western Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Bullock v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API