Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 17, 1999No. A9210-07050; CA A86556PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1ConcurrenceRiggs, J.

Defendant Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Key)1 appeals from a jury verdict in favor of defendant/cross-claim plaintiff Dr. Frederick Edwards (Edwards), that awarded a total of $23 million in compensatory and punitive damages. Key manufactures the prescription drug Theo-Dur, an asthma medication containing theophylline. This action was brought on behalf of Paul Bocci, III (Bocci), a long-time user of Theo-Dur, against Key for negligence and strict products liability after he suffered permanent brain damage as a result of theophylline toxicity. A claim was also brought against Edwards for medical…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Mead v. Legacy Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API