Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
(Cases Consolidated for Argument and Decision
1Opinion of the CourtKulongoski, J.
Parrott (plaintiff) 1 brought this civil action against Carr Chevrolet, Inc. (defendant), arising from defendant’s sale of a used 1983 Chevrolet Suburban to plaintiff. Plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that defendant had violated certain provisions of the Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA), ORS 646.608(l)(e), (g), and (t). 2 The jury returned a verdict in plaintiffs favor and awarded $11,496 in compensatory damages and $1 million in punitive damages. After the verdict, defendant filed motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) under Oregon Rule of Civil Procedure (ORCP) 63 or, in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Vasquez-Lopez v. Beneficial Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Estate of Overbey v. Chad Franklin National Auto Sales North, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.