Bova v. City of Medford
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
This consolidated appeal involves a series of judgments entered in favor of plaintiff, a now-retired employee of the City of Medford, in his class action suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against the city and its city manager.1 The factual premise of plaintiffs suit is simple and undisputed: The city made health care insurance coverage available to plaintiff and other city employees who were members of the class, but it did not offer that same coverage to the class members when they retired. The trial court concluded that, in failing to offer that coverage, the city violated ORS…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Bova v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Doyle v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Doyle v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Adelsperger v. Elkside Development LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2023
- Doyle v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Davis v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Bova v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Bova v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.