Legal Opinion
Bova v. City of Medford
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 13, 2014No. 081663E7; A150810PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHUMAN, S. J.
Plaintiff is a retired employee of defendant, the City of Medford. Both parties petition this court for reconsideration of its opinion in Bova v. City of Medford, 263 Or App 179, 326 P3d 1256 (2014) CBova II). In that opinion, we summarized the procedural posture and the parties’ positions as follows:
“The underlying dispute is over the city’s refusal to make available to retired employees the same health care insurance that was available to them before retirement. The trial court ruled in favor of plaintiff on his claim that the city violated a statute requiring local…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gilbert v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers, Local Union No. 701Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Strunk v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Crandon Capital Partners v. ShelkOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Pendleton School District 16R v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Bova v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- De Young v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Powell v. RasmussenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022