Legal Opinion

Doyle v. City of Medford

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 2010No. 07-35753PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs, who are former employees of Defendant City of Medford (“City”), allege that the City’s policy of denying health insurance coverage to retirees violates their due process rights. Specifically, Plaintiffs contend that Oregon Revised Statutes section 243.303 and City Resolution No. 5715 confer on them a property interest in post-retirement health insurance coverage that is protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Section 243.303 provides that a local government that offers health insurance coverage to its officers and employees “shall,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Town of Castle Rock v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Ralph E. Thornton Cheryl A. Thornton v. City of St. Helens Warren Baker Brian LittleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Jack Allen v. City of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Shanks v. DresselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Durland v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Helen Armstrong v. Terry ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  3. Doyle v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Depaul Industries v. Benjamin MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API