Doyle v. City of Medford
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.
Plaintiffs are retired employees of defendant, the City of Medford. Plaintiffs brought this action against the city, alleging several claims, including a claim that the city had violated ORS 243.303(2), set out below, by failing to make healthcare insurance coverage available to them in their retirement. Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief and damages to compensate them for their additional medical and insurance expenses as well as noneconomic damages and attorney fees.1 On the parties’ motions for summary judgment on the issue of the city’s liability for violating ORS 243.303(2), the trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brooks v. DierkerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Doyle v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Doyle v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. BradleyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Comcast of Oregon II, Inc. v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Diens v. BonomeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Kessler v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Bova v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Kessler v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Kramer v. ConatserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.