Legal Opinion

Padilla v. City of Santa Fe

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1988No. 8263PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s decision, in a suit to quiet title, denying their claims to a lot that lies above Alameda Street in Santa Fe (the disputed tract) and granting defendant’s counterclaim to quiet title. Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in construing the description of a larger parcel from which the disputed tract was conveyed, because the trial court (1) added words to the description and (2) failed to apply relevant rules of construction. Plaintiffs also contend (3) there is insufficient evidence to support the dispositive findings and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Genuine Parts Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Roybal v. MorrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. City of Raton v. Vermejo Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Komadina v. EdmondsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Hughes v. MeemNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. RHN CORP. v. VeibellUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Burnham v. City of FarmingtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Quintana v. KnowlesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Quarles v. ArcegaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Meiboom v. WatsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API