Legal Opinion

Komadina v. Edmondson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1970No. 8816PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPIESS, C. J., Court of Appeals.

This appeal is from a nonsuit granted pursuant to Rule 41(b) [§ 21-1-1(41) (b), N.M.S.A.1953] dismissing plaintiffs’ cause of action at the close of their case. The plaintiffs, Ann Komadina and Frances Komadina brought this action to quiet title to certain lands claimed by them within the exterior boundaries of the Atrisco Land Grant.

The defendants, Edna A. Edmondson, George B. Edmondson, A. A. Herrera and Maria O. Herrera, denied plaintiffs’ claim of title.

Rule 41(b) authorizes the court upon a motion to dismiss at the close of plaintiffs’ case to weigh…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marquez v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Duckett v. . LydaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Apodaca v. LuerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Adams v. CoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hughes v. MeemNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Worthey v. Sedillo Title Guaranty, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Pacheco v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Village of Wagon Mound v. Mora TrustNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Blumenthal v. Concrete Constructors Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Northrip v. ConnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API