Legal Opinion

Quintana v. Knowles

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1993No. 13044PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Chief Judge.

Defendants appeal from a district court judgment (1) declaring a certain road a public highway pursuant to Act of July 26, 1866, chapter 262, Section 8, 14 Stat. 251, 253 (codified at 43 U.S.C. Section 932) (repealed 1976) (hereinafter 43 U.S.C. Section 932) and (2) extending the width of the road to sixty feet pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 67-5-2 without compensating them for the extension. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

The district court found that the road prior to 1931 “paralleled and meandered back and forth along the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weiland Ex Rel. Weiland v. VigilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Groff v. Circle K. CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Herbertson v. IliffNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Luchetti v. BandlerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Padilla v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. King v. UU Bar Ranch Ltd. PartnershipNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Dethlefsen v. WeddleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Hamaatsa, Inc. v. Pueblo of San FelipeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Hamaatsa, Inc. v. Pueblo of San FelipeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Hamaatsa, Inc. v. Pueblo of San FelipeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API