Legal Opinion

Burnham v. City of Farmington

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1998No. 17917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge.

{1} The boundary line between the properties in this quiet title dispute is the Animas River as it ran in February 1943. The district court located the boundary on the north edge of the river. We conclude that the boundary call to the river in the deeds at issue takes to the middle of the river rather than its north edge. We further conclude that there was substantial evidence for the district court to find that the main channel of the Animas River as it existed in February 1943 was the north channel, and given this finding, that the call to the Animas River located the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cave v. CaveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Strata Production Co. v. Mercury Exploration Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Sanchez v. Homestake Mining Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Hernandez v. Mead Foods, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Landavazo v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Madrid v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Village of Wagon Mound v. Mora TrustNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'n ex rel. First Security Bank, N.A. v. Southeastern New Mexico Affordable Housing Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
  5. Amethyst Land Co., Inc. v. TerhuneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API