Matter of Estate of Flowers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
848 P.2d 1146 (1993)
In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Edna L. Rogers FLOWERS, Deceased.
Lois L. Flowers HOOPER, Appellee,
v.
Nola CLINKINGBEARD, Lillian Fowler, Ratha Reynolds and Faye Davis Dattuso, Appellants.
No. 77386.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
March 16, 1993.
Mary S. Robertson, Steven P. Cole, Oklahoma City, for appellants.
Lawrence W. Parish, Joel D. Butterworth, Oklahoma City, for appellee.
KAUGER, Justice:
Two issues[1] are presented: 1) whether the appellee, Lois L. Flowers Hooper (Hooper/adopted daughter/pretermitted heir), qualifies as a pretermitted heir under 84 O.S. 1991 § 132;[2] and 2)…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Hodges; Concurrence · Hodges; Dissent.
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- McClure v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. ColclazierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Cox v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- King v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.