Legal Opinion
McClure v. ConocoPhillips Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 20, 2006No. 103,199PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWatt, C.J.
¶ 1 The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma certified a single first impression question of Oklahoma law to this Court under the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S.2001 §§ 1601, et seq. As reformulated, 1 the question is:
Whether the Oklahoma Standards for Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Act (Testing Act), 40 O.S.2001 § 551 et seq. and the administrative rules promulgated pursuant thereto, allow an employer, using an approved evidential breath testing (EBT) 2 device, to confirm an initial positive alcohol test by a second test…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Howard v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- ODOM v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.