Legal Opinion

King v. King

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 2005No. 99,248PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, J.:

¶ 1 We granted certiorari to consider a single first impression issue: whether a prevailing parent, demonstrating good cause for withholding court-ordered visitation, is entitled to appeal-related attorney fees pursuant to 43 O.S. Supp.2003 § 112(D)(2).1 We determine that the statute supports an award *572of appeal-related attorney fees. Furthermore, the defendant/appellant, Barbara King (mother) is entitled to recover such fees because: 1) she demonstrated good cause for ■withholding visitation — -the possibility of the child’s sexual abuse by others while in the custody of the…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. McClure v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Welch v. CrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  4. Phillips v. HedgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. Tyler v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API