Legal Opinion

Merchants State Bank v. Umlauf

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 25, 1924No. 24,022PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Each of these actions was brought upon a promissory note payable to John J. Maurin and by him indorsed to plaintiff before maturity. The defense in each was based on section 6015, G. S. 1913. The actions were consolidated for trial by jury. The jury made special findings and returned general verdicts in favor of the defendants. Plaintiff has appealed from orders denying its motions for judgment or for a new trial.

The defendants, who áre brothers, are single men, living with their mother on a farm near Fergus Falls. One is 40 and the other 39 years of age. They have had a common school…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. RathaiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Mackey v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  3. O'Gara, King & Co. v. HansingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Green v. GunstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Savings Bank v. SchaalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. M & M Securities Co. v. DirnbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Gross v. Ohio Savings & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Farm Mortgage & Loan Co. v. PedersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. United States v. SzapowalDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API