Legal Opinion

Farm Mortgage & Loan Co. v. Pederson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 9, 1925No. 24,860PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

In this action upon promissory notes, signed by defendant and transferred to plaintiff, a verdict was, rendered for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying its motion for judgment not withstanding the verdict or a new trial.

In the spring of 1920, San Benito Land Company, a corporatioi with its home office in Kansas City, Missouri, was engaged in dis posing of land in Texas. Its agent, one Hutchinson, induced defend ant, a resident of this state, and) some of his neighbors to go am see the land with an excursion party gotten up and mostly pah for by the company. On the way home…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. RathaiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Mackey v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  3. Merchants State Bank v. UmlaufSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. M & M Securities Co. v. DirnbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Wismo Company v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Marion v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API