Gross v. Ohio Savings & Trust Co.

The principal contention between the parties in this case arises from the defense that the note sued upon was procured by fraud and trickery upon the part of the agents of the Union Drug Company, the payee of the note. Before going into a discussion of the question of law presented it seems essential that there be a recitation of the facts disclosed by the record. There is little dispute as to the facts upon which the controversy is based.

The only testimony with reference to the occurrence at the time of the execution of the note was that of the defendant, Gross, the maker of the note. Gross…