Legal Opinion

Mackey v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1882PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, refusing a new trial. . The case is. stated in the opinion. cited Walker v. Ebert, 29 Wis, 194; Kellogg y. Steiner, 29 Wis. 626; Griffiths v. Kellogg, 39 Wis, 290; Wait v. Pomeroy, 20 Mich. 425; Burson v. Huntington, 21 Mich. 415; Foster v. Mackinnon, L. E. 4 C. P. 704; Whitney y, Snyder, 2 Lans. 477; Fayette Go. Savings Bank v. Steffes, 54 Iowa, 214.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

Action on a negotiable promissory note, made by defendant, payable to the Light-Draft Plow Company, or bearer, and transferred before due to plaintiff. On the trial the plaintiff proved that the note was transferred to him in the usual course of business, before due, for a valuable consideration, and that he had no notice of-any defect in or defence to it. The defendant, without offering any evidence that would tend to prove that plaintiff was not - a bona fide holder, offered to prove that he signed the note supposing *299it to be merely a receipt for a plow which the company had delivered to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Putnam v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Chapman v. . RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Douglass v. MattingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  4. Shirt v. OverjohnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  5. Whitney v. SnyderNew York Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. M & M Securities Co. v. DirnbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Ort v. FowlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  4. C. Aultman & Co. v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  5. First National Bank v. HallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API