Legal Opinion

Savings Bank v. Schaal

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 5, 1923No. 23,569PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The appeal is from an order denying a new trial, after verdict for defendant, in an action upon a promissory note.

Plaintiff, a hank at Kewanee, Illinois, claimed to be a purchaser in good faith, for value and before maturity, of a $6,000 promissory note purporting to be made by defendant,. dated October 9, 1920, payable to the order of Murray Bros. & Ward Land Company on or before March 1, 1921, indorsed and payment guaranteed by the payee who also waived notice of dishonor and protest. The answer denied execution and delivery, and averred that, if any instrument in the form alleged had been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union National Bank v. WinsorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. First National Bank v. DenfeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Merchants State Bank v. UmlaufSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. First Nat. Bank v. Cross NapperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API