Woodsend v. Chatom
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSea Well, J.
This is an action in conversion. Judgment went for plaintiff and defendants have appealed.
Respondent, as party of the first part, and H. B. Wyllie, as party of the second part, entered into a contract, agreement, or lease, the nature of which is a matter of dispute, whereby the party of the first part agreed to lease to the party of the second part 240 acres of land owned by the former and situate in Tulare County. The instrument provided for a term of three years with a renewal privilege of two years. By said instrument the party of the first part agreed to furnish certain seed for the first…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Smyth v. TankersleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Harrelson v. Miller & Lux Inc.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Clarke v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Thompson v. MawhinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
- Smith v. SchultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Barkhaus v. Producers Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- In Re OkaharaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Devereaux Mortgage Co. v. WalkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Underhill v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Cox v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.