Legal Opinion

Smith v. Schultz

California Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1891No. 12376PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinión of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFakland, J.

— The complaint sets forth a certain written instrument, executed December 10, 1883, by plaintiff, J. C. Smith, as party of the first part, and the defendants Schultz and L. E. Caldwell, parties of the second part, and avers that said instrument created a partnership between said three persons “ in the business of raising hogs,” to be conducted on a certain tract of land, or ranch, owned by the plaintiff, and which, by the terms of said instrument, is leased to said Schultz and L. E. Caldwell for the term of three years from the first day of December, 1883. It is also averred that said L. E.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Prince v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Westcott v. GilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State Ex Rel. v. Retail Credit Men's Ass'nTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hicks v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Johnston v. DelayNevada Supreme Court · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API