Legal Opinion
Cox v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 16, 1936No. Civ. 5541PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUTON, J., pro tem.
On November 27,1929, Frank Cox, the respondent here, leased to L. F. Miller approximately 300 acres of land for the ensuing crop year. In this lease Miller covenanted to pay to respondent as rent, the sum of $7,500, to be paid in two instalments, $4,500 on the execution of the lease, which was paid in due course) and $3,000 on or before September 1, 1930. It was also agreed in the lease that Miller should pay all tolls of water used by him on the leased premises, and reasonable attorneys’ fees in the event of a suit.
Appended to this lease, and as a part thereof, was a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Clarke v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Woodsend v. ChatomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- Warren A. Ott, and Mortgage Services of Norfolk, Inc., a Corporation v. Home Savings & Loan Association, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Goodwin v. BradenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Harabedian v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Tozzi v. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939