Sluimer v. Verity, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its published opinion at 628 F.Supp.2d 1099 (N.D.Cal.2008), attached as Appendix A.
AFFIRMED.
APPENDIX A
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HUGO SLUIMER, Plaintiff,
v.
VERITY INC, and THE VERITY, INC., CHANGE IN CONTROL AND SEVERANCE BENEFIT PLAN, Defendants.
No. C 08-01220 SI
ORDER RANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The parties have filed cross-motion for summary judgment, and defendant has
filed a motion to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Trunk v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Brooks v. Capistrano Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Latif v. HolderDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Swissport Fueling, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Huitt v. Optum Health ServicesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.