Legal Opinion

Latif v. Holder

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 24, 2014No. 3:10-CV-00750-BRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BROWN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion (# 85) for Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion (# 91) for Partial Summary Judgment. The parties each seek summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ Claim One of the Third Amended Complaint (# 83) (that Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ right to procedural due process under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution) and Claim Three (that Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ rights under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 706). In their claims Plaintiffs specifically…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rahinah Ibrahim v. US Dept. of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Faisal Nabin Kashem v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Yonas Fikre v. FbiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Kovac v. WrayDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2019
  5. Elhady v. KableDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API