Legal Opinion
Bi-County Dev. of Clinton, Inc. v. Borough of High Bridge
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 18, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
775 A.2d 182 (2001)
BI-COUNTY DEVELOPMENT OF CLINTON, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
BOROUGH OF HIGH BRIDGE, a municipal corporation of the State of New Jersey, Defendant-Appellant, and
Clinton Township Sewerage Authority, a New Jersey Utility and the State of New Jersey, Defendants.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 21, 2001.
Decided June 18, 2001.
Valerie K. Bollheimer argued the cause for appellant (Purcell, Ries, Shannon, Mulcahy & O'Neill, attorneys; Ms. Bollheimer, Bedminster, on the brief).
Robert M. Washburn argued the cause for respondent (Flaster/Greenberg,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Holmdel Builders Ass'n v. Township of HolmdelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Mongiello v. Borough of HightstownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Samaritan Center v. Borough of EnglishtownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- DYNASTY BLDG. v. Upper Saddle RiverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Howell Properties, Inc. v. Twp. of BrickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Bi-County Development of Clinton, Inc. v. Borough of High BridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Tp. of West Orange v. 769 Association, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Bi-County Development of Clinton, Inc. v. Borough of High BridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002