Legal Opinion
DYNASTY BLDG. v. Upper Saddle River
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 29, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
267 N.J. Super. 611 (1993)
632 A.2d 544
DYNASTY BUILDING CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BOROUGH OF UPPER SADDLE RIVER, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF UPPER SADDLE RIVER; AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF UPPER SADDLE RIVER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND UNITED CITIZENS OF UPPER SADDLE RIVER; BOROUGH OF RAMSEY; CONCERNED CITIZENS OF UPPER SADDLE RIVER AND RAMSEY; EFSHER PROPERTY ASSOCIATES,[*] DEFENDANTS-INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 14, 1993.
Decided October 29, 1993.
B…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Mathews v. CintronSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ledezma v. a & L DRYWALLNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- Toll Bros. v. Township of West WindsorNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Samaritan Center v. Borough of EnglishtownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Bi-County Dev. of Clinton, Inc. v. Borough of High BridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Bi-County Development of Clinton, Inc. v. Borough of High BridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Bi-County Development of Clinton, Inc. v. Borough of High BridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002