Bi-County Development of Clinton, Inc. v. Borough of High Bridge
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
805 A.2d 433 (2002)
174 N.J. 301
BI-COUNTY DEVELOPMENT OF CLINTON, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BOROUGH OF HIGH BRIDGE, a municipal corporation of the State of New Jersey and State of New Jersey, Defendants-Respondents, and
Clinton Township Sewerage Authority, a New Jersey Public Utility, Defendants.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 11, 2002.
Decided August 5, 2002.
Carl S. Bisgaier, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for appellant (Flaster/Greenberg, attorneys; Mr. Bisgaier and Sharon A. Morgenroth, on the briefs).
Valerie K. Bollheimer, Bedminister, argued the cause…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Mathews v. CintronSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hills Dev. Co. v. Bernards Tp. in Somerset Cty.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Holmdel Builders Ass'n v. Township of HolmdelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.