Legal Opinion

Bi-County Development of Clinton, Inc. v. Borough of High Bridge

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 5, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

805 A.2d 433 (2002)

174 N.J. 301

BI-COUNTY DEVELOPMENT OF CLINTON, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BOROUGH OF HIGH BRIDGE, a municipal corporation of the State of New Jersey and State of New Jersey, Defendants-Respondents, and

Clinton Township Sewerage Authority, a New Jersey Public Utility, Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 11, 2002.

Decided August 5, 2002.

Carl S. Bisgaier, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for appellant (Flaster/Greenberg, attorneys; Mr. Bisgaier and Sharon A. Morgenroth, on the briefs).

Valerie K. Bollheimer, Bedminister, argued the cause…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. Mathews v. CintronSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Hills Dev. Co. v. Bernards Tp. in Somerset Cty.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Holmdel Builders Ass'n v. Township of HolmdelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API