Legal Opinion
Bi-County Development of Clinton, Inc. v. Borough of High Bridge
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 5, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
STEIN, J.
The issue before the Court is whether a developer that pays money into a municipality’s affordable housing fund instead of constructing housing units affordable to lower income households may compel an adjoining municipality to allow it to connect into its municipal sewer system.
The Law Division granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Bi-County Development of Clinton, Inc. (Bi-County), holding that Bi-County’s proposed development qualified as an inclusionary development and that the refusal of defendant, Borough of High Bridge (High…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Mathews v. CintronSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hills Dev. Co. v. Bernards Tp. in Somerset Cty.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Holmdel Builders Ass'n v. Township of HolmdelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Six Month Extension of NJACNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Mount Olive Complex v. Township of Mount OliveNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Bi-County Development of Clinton, Inc. v. Borough of High BridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Mount Olive Complex v. Township of Mount OliveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002