Legal Opinion
Mongiello v. Borough of Hightstown
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 14, 1955PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Jacobs, J.
In Mongiello v. Borough of Hightstown, 31 N. J. Super. 1 (1954), the Appellate Division held that the Borough of Hightstown was under no duty to supply water from its municipal water supply system to the plaintiff, a resident of the adjoining Township of East Windsor. We granted certification under B. B. 1:10-2. See 16 N. J. 221 (1954).
Hightstown, which is entirely surrounded by East Windsor, originally established its municipal water supply system in 1895 through the issuance of municipal bonds. The water is obtained from artesian wells…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Childs v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Pikes Peak Power Co. v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Altoona v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Town of Wickenburg v. SabinArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Richards v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Yardville Estates, Inc. v. City of TrentonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- STATE, BD. OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMM'RS v. East Shores, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Langan v. West Keansburg Water Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Bi-County Dev. of Clinton, Inc. v. Borough of High BridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Bi-County Development of Clinton, Inc. v. Borough of High BridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.