Legal Opinion

Farr v. Bramblett

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1955No. Civ. 16114PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

This is an action for libel by newspaper advertisements during the 1950 election campaign of defendant Bramblett as congressman for the Eleventh (now Thirteenth) Congressional District of California. With Bramblett active members of his campaign committee and of the Eleventh Congressional District Republican Committee are made defendants. Plaintiffs are Fredrick S. Farr, an attorney, and his wife, both at that time active in the campaign for the democratic candidate in that district, Marion R. Walker.

With respect to plaintiffs’ fourth amended complaint the trial court granted motions to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ostrowe v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Washer v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Snively v. Record Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1921

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Wheeler v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Bradley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Live Oak Publishing Co. v. CohaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API