Legal Opinion
Walker v. Home Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1956No. Civ. 21540PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Parker), J.
Prior to the commencement of this action, plaintiffs recovered judgment for $9,286.27 against one Paolo Bonomo for damages sustained as a result of an automobile collision.
The present action is to recover the amount of that judgment from Home Indemnity Company which had issued an automobile insurance policy covering the automobile of Bonomo. The agent of the indemnity company, J. D. Palmer, who represented the company in issuing the policy, was also a defendant. In a trial without a jury, a nonsuit was granted as to the agent. Judgment was for plaintiffs against defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parke v. FranciscusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Carlesimo v. SchwebelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- MacKintosh v. Agricultural Fire Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Kerr v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lippert v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Van Dyke v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Tri-Delta Engineering, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Home Indemnity Co. v. Mission InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Varela v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.