In Re Mingo
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, C. J.
Defendant was convicted of having intoxicating liquor in his possession and sentenced to pay a fine of five hundred dollars and to be imprisoned ninety days in jail. The Volstead Act and the Wright Act make the first offense punishable by fine only. An ordinance of Kings County, adopted January 5, 1922, prescribes as the maximum for such offense a fine of five hundred dollars and imprisonment for not more than ninety days. The complaint charged a violation of this ordinance. The question presented is whether the ordinance fixing a greater punishment than is prescribed by the state law for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- In re SicCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- In Re MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Ex parte StephenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In Re PolizzottoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Galvan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.