Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Murray
California Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1872No. 3,318PublishedCited by 23 opinions
The petitioner was taken before the Court upon a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Wallace, C. J.:
The return made to the writ issued in this case shows that the prisoner is detained by the Sheriff under a commitment of the Police Judge’s Court of the City and County of San Francisco, which is as follows:
“ In the Police Judge’s Court of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California: The People of the State of California v. Patrick Murray. State of California, City and County of San Francisco, ss.—The People of the State of California to the Sheriff of the City and County of San *456Francisco, greeting: Whereas, Patrick Murray, having been duly convicted…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Smith v. HessIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- People v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- State ex rel. Nicholson v. BolesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
- Lee Lim v. Davis, WardenUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- Ex parte WinstonNevada Supreme Court · 1873
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.