Legal Opinion

Kumaraperu v. Feldsted CA2/1

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 2015No. B253978PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHANEY, Acting P. J. —

In this legal malpractice action, plaintiff Sondra Wise Kumaraperu alleges her attorneys negligently advised her to draw a check on an account that she owned but on which she was not a signatory and deposit the funds into another account she owned, which she alleges exposed her to a criminal forgery prosecution. The trial court sustained the attorneys’ demurrer without leave to amend on the grounds that Kumaraperu bore unclean hands and failed to allege she had been found factually innocent of forgery. We affirm, but on a different ground; Transferring one’s own…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Mitchell v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Modisette v. Apple Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Hart v. Darwish, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Avetisyan v. Drinker Biddle & Reath CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Carlos Urias v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
  5. Dang v. PontierDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API