Legal Opinion

Hart v. Darwish

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 1, 2017No. B270513PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoffstadt, J.

*221Where a plaintiff brings a lawsuit against a defendant, and the trial court denies a motion by the defendant for summary judgment or for nonsuit made after the plaintiff's case-in-chief, or the trier of fact returns a verdict for the plaintiff, that ruling or verdict-if decided on the merits and not procured by fraud-establishes as a matter of law that the plaintiff had probable cause to bring its lawsuit and precludes a subsequent claim against the plaintiff for maliciously prosecuting that lawsuit, even if the trier of fact later rules for the defendant or the verdict is later overturned.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Wilson v. Parker, Covert & ChidesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. People v. LawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Abir Cohen Treyzon Salo, LLP v. LahijiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  2. Barajas v. Satvia L.A. County Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  3. Ceron v. LiuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. Divine Food and Catering v. Western Diocese of the Armenian etc.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Divine Food and Catering v. Western Diocese of the Armenian etc.California Court of Appeal · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API