Dang v. Pontier

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH DANG d/b/a LAW OFFICE OF Case No.: 19CV1519-GPC(AHG) JOSEPH DANG, an individual, 12 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiff, 13 DENYING IN PART v. COUNTERDEFENDANT DANG’S 14 MOTION FOR SUMMARY DAVID PONTIER, an individual; 15 JUDGMENT AND DENYING TEOCO Corporation Group Benefit Plan, COUNTERPLAINTIFF PONTIER’S 16 a self-funded group health plan; TEOCO AMENDED MOTION FOR Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; 17 SUMMARY JUDGMENT UMR Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Glenn 18 C. Nusbaum, an individual; Paul E.…