Legal Opinion

People v. Paul

California Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1998No. S057084PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

In this matter we interpret the special “verdict or finding” 1 requirement of Penal Code section 1158a 2 in a case in which each count of the information charges two defendants jointly with a substantive offense and also, pursuant to section 12022, subdivision (a)(1), charges that a principal was armed during the commission of the offense. Specifically, we consider whether the special verdict or finding requirement of section 1158a is satisfied when a jointly charged defendant is not specifically named in the arming finding returned by the jury, but the finding instead…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. BeamonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. Superior Court (Marks)California Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. AshbeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API