Legal Opinion

State v. Praetorians

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 26, 1933No. 3 Div. 43PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Appellee is a fraternal life insurance company authorized and doing business in Alabama, and by this proceeding the state seeks the collection of what is designated by the parties a license or excise tax attempted to be imposed under the latter provisions of section 8505, Code 1923. As originally enacted (General Acts 1911, page 700, § 30), this statute contained only the exemption feature as follows: “Every fraternal benefit society organized or licensed under this act, is hereby declared to be a charitable and benevolent in stitution, and all of its funds shall he exempt…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Reynolds v. CollierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. State v. GoldsteinAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. State v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Beeland Wholesale Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. State v. Calumet & Hecla Consol. Copper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Smith v. SchulteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Newberry v. City of AndalusiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Ex Parte HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API