Legal Opinion
Beeland Wholesale Co. v. Kaufman
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 18, 1937No. 3 Div. 198PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The purpose of this litigation is to test the validity of an act of the Legislature, as amended, known as the “Unemployment Compensation Law.” Gen. Acts of 1935, p. 950; Gen.Acts of 1936, Ex.Sess., pp. 176, 225, 228.
Briefly stated for the immediate purpose of stating the issues, it may be said to require certain employers and employees to make regular contributions to a fund to be paid to the employees of that class, when unemployed, according to the requirements and restrictions fully. expressed. The employer means any person or corporation who has employed at least eight…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- In Re" Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Department of Unemployment Compensation v. Continental Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.