Legal Opinion

State v. Goldstein

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 25, 1922No. 6 Div. 926PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

It will be observed that the act makes “profiteering” a crime, the penalty for which is a maximum fine of $5,000, and imprisonment at hard labor for the county for not exceeding two years, and also subjects the “profiteer” to a civil suit, to be instituted by the Attorney General in the name of tire state, wherein may he recovered such damages “as the jury see fit to assess.”

Section 2 of the act defines the offense of “profiteering” as “the selling or offering for sale of any article or commodity of food, clothing, fuel or other necessity of life with the intent of obtaining fraudulent or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Butchers' Union Slaughter-House & Live-Stock Landing Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Franklin v. State Ex Rel. Alabama State Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Woco Pep Co. of Montgomery v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Mobile Gas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. City of Mobile v. RouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. City of Birmingham v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API