Legal Opinion
Sauer Incorporated v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary of the Navy
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 20, 2000No. 99-1206PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Sauer Inc. appeals the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals denying its request for an equitable adjustment of a construction contract and for remission of liquidated damages imposed under the contract. We affirm the Board’s ruling as to all but one of the issues Sauer raises on appeal. On the remaining issue of Sauer’s entitlement to an adjustment for labor and equipment inefficiencies, we vacate and remand for further proceedings.
I
A
In February 1986, the government and Sauer entered into a fixed-price construction contract (the RIF Contract) for the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Electronic and Missile Facilities, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Blinderman Construction Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- William F. Klingensmith, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- C.B.C. Enterprises, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- P.J. Dick Inc. v. PrincipiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- George Sollitt Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Nicon, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Kinetic Builder's, Inc.,appellant v. F. Whitten Peters, Secretary of the Air Force,appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Morganti National, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.