Legal Opinion
Morganti National, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 4, 2001No. 97-744CPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The present action was brought pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-603 (2000). Plaintiff-contractor Morganti National, Inc. (“Morganti”) was default terminated for failure to make progress in constructing the 1,000 Bed Federal Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York. In this action, Morganti seeks to convert the termination for default into a termination for the convenience of the government on the grounds that the defendant excusably delayed its performance and materially breached the contract. Defendant Federal Bureau of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Emily Malone D/B/A Precision Cabinet Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Global Environmental Solutions Business Division v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Anthony A. Greco v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation, and General Dynamics Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Hi-Shear Technology Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- J. Cooper & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- R.P. Wallace, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Aptus Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.