Legal Opinion

Mozingo v. North Carolina National Bank

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1976No. 763SC404PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

We first consider whether the trial court erred in dismissing, under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6), plaintiffs’ claim for breach of the alleged oral contract to renew plaintiffs’ unsecured notes until payment could be made from proceeds of the sale of the apartment projects. Rule 12(b) (6) provides that a complaint must be dismissed when on its face it appears that no law supports it, that some fact essential to it is missing, or that some disclosed fact necessarily defeats it. Hodges v. Wellons, 9 N.C. App. 152, 175 S.E. 2d 690, cert. den. 277 N.C. 251 (1970). The trial court held…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Evans v. Freeman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Turner v. BlackburnDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1975
  4. BORDEN, INCORPORATED v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. National Bank v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mosley v. National Finance Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Schloss Outdoor Advertising Co. v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Mumford v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Hinshaw v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Craig v. CallowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API