Legal Opinion

Craig v. Calloway

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1984No. 8325SC529PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff makes several assignments of error. They concern the trial court’s refusal to allow certain requested instructions, the admissibility of testimony and documentary evidence, and the failure of the trial court to award a new trial based on alleged misunderstanding of the jurors of the consequences of their verdict. We overrule all assignments of error and affirm.

Plaintiff first argues that the trial court incorrectly denied plaintiffs request for a jury instruction that written instruments control any parol evidence to the contrary. Plaintiff contended throughout…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neal v. MarroneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Baker v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Baker v. . WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. BORDEN, INCORPORATED v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Selph v. SelphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. AlexanderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. McClain v. Otis Elevator Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Allen v. Weyerhaeuser, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Smith v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API